Daedelus on Social and Legal Aspects of DRM
Vanishing Content - does DRM bring 1984 here at last?
Coming soon - does DRM allow 'reality changes'.
In George Orwell's novel 1984 (written in post-war England in 1948),
the author postulates a police state in which a covert role of the
government's Ministry of Information is to destroy or better still
re-write any document or book which conflicts with the politically
correct, media supported view of the time - in such a way as to change
citizens perception of history and to un-write unfavorable history. Some
pundits claim that digital rights management is exactly the tool to make
this nightmare become reality.
- The role of central repositories.
- The credibility of sources.
- Electronic vs. Hardcopy data stores.
- Closed vs. Open systems.
Future articles
- Why disintermediation failed.
- Crackers and Hackers - Rebels or Counter Revolutionaries? How
DRM Cracking put power back into the hands of the Big Guys and put
the Indies back where they always were.
- Here are some thoughts exchanged with Steve Rowat on his interesting observations
on DRM at
www.rowatworks.com/Overview_Indexes/DRM_Micropayment_ODRL_XrML.html
. Steve postulates a low cost universal DRM system allowing
individuals to control the sales of their own IP.
"One of the
problems about developing low cost DRM for individual is that the cost
of hacking pushes up the base cost of solutions to the 'enterprise'
type costs that you outline.
Thus if it takes several man-years to develop a useful, transparent
DRM system (as it does in general experience - that's why the world is
not flooded with shareware/freeware DRM) then a corporate sale to say
a banking customer for internal use will just about pay off the
programmer's expenses and a salary sized support contract might allow
him to keep up with ongoing 'hacking' (in the true sense). If the same
people sell the software for $99 per publisher then within a couple of
sales hundreds of crackers will have attacked the system. As public
DRM systems cannot obey Kerckhoffs's axiom of the primacy of keys (or
at least the keys have in some way to get to the public users PC
sometime in the process) and there are many intensely anti-DRM people
with weeks of months to spare the reverse engineer the products- then
DRM for the individual or independent just isn't going to happen - the
crackers have forced the control of IP back into the hands of the
giants who control the less vulnerable channels of distribution and
exploitation."
Interesting
observations. Thanks for sending your comments.
>- then DRM for the individual just isn't going to happen - the
crackers
>have forced the control of IP back into the hands of the giants who
>control the less vulnerable channels of distribution and
exploitation.
Your last line is, well, tragic as far as I'm concerned. I hope in the
long term something will develop that won't be as easily hackable.
Perhaps,
for instance, if each individual creative-seller has their own system
subsisting within ODRL, it won't be worth the hackers time to break
that
subsystem? Yet, would be cheap to set up because most of the security
would be in place for the larger system (ODRL/browsers) and maintained
regularly by them? I'm out of my depth here, but hopeful.... :-)
- Protect and Survive
Coming soon DRM Follies
"If you start me up, If you start me up I’ll never
stop
If you start me up, If you start me up I’ll never stop
I’ve been running hot, You got me ticking gonna blow my top
If you start me up, If you start me up I’ll never stop
(Chorus) You make a grown man cry"
Microsoft Windows 95 Theme tune.
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the
ability to
learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for
their apparent disinclination to do so."
Douglas Adams
Technical aspects of Digital Rights Management
|